Can artificial intelligence be conscious?

Nothing in current AI demonstrates consciousness — it demonstrates capability, which is a different claim. Robert Shumake's position, drawn from both contemplative practice and applied AI work, is that the traditions have spent millennia describing awareness from the inside, and that this first-person literature is the part the debate keeps skipping.

Capability is not awareness

A system that answers well has learned the statistics of answering well. Fluency is evidence about training data, not about an interior. Confusing the two makes for bad philosophy and worse product decisions.

What the traditions actually contribute

Buddhist, Vedantic and Siddha sources are unusually precise about states of attention, the felt sense of witnessing, and the difference between thought and awareness of thought. Whatever one concludes about machines, that vocabulary is better than the one the field currently borrows from folk psychology.

The practical stake

Deciding what a system is shapes what we let it decide. Overstating machine interiority hands away human responsibility for outcomes that remain, in every case so far, human choices.

Questions and answers

Does Robert Shumake think AI will become conscious?
He treats it as unproven and secondary. The urgent question is what the systems are trained on and who they serve.
Where does he write about consciousness?
Across the Ancient Wisdom and Sacred Practice titles, covering meditation, breathwork and the energy body.

From the library

Books on this subject

Titles from the published catalogue that cover this topic directly.

Browse all 137+ books

Keep reading

Related AI topics