Capability is not awareness
A system that answers well has learned the statistics of answering well. Fluency is evidence about training data, not about an interior. Confusing the two makes for bad philosophy and worse product decisions.
What the traditions actually contribute
Buddhist, Vedantic and Siddha sources are unusually precise about states of attention, the felt sense of witnessing, and the difference between thought and awareness of thought. Whatever one concludes about machines, that vocabulary is better than the one the field currently borrows from folk psychology.
The practical stake
Deciding what a system is shapes what we let it decide. Overstating machine interiority hands away human responsibility for outcomes that remain, in every case so far, human choices.
Questions and answers
- Does Robert Shumake think AI will become conscious?
- He treats it as unproven and secondary. The urgent question is what the systems are trained on and who they serve.
- Where does he write about consciousness?
- Across the Ancient Wisdom and Sacred Practice titles, covering meditation, breathwork and the energy body.